From my point of view before analyzing Vygotsky's perspective on
constructivist learning, we must first analyze and understand that all is
constructivism? Then according to this idea, constructivism suggests that
learning is not something that is simply transmitted from one person to
another, but on the contrary for this to happen knowledge or what is to be
learned must be built by the learner himself, Through action and application in
different contexts. Therefore taking this approach to the classroom could say
that the teacher acts as a mediator between what is going to be learned and who
learns, hence the theory of meaningful learning.
Vygotsky, unlike Piaget or David Ausubel, focuses his attention on the child's immediate environment, what kind of knowledge the educator can offer him, and how history and culture are very important in understanding the development of learning in the child. Taking this reference as educators we have the responsibility to first understand that all the context where the child develops before thinking about how to transmit knowledge, in contrast and critically the current education in Colombia mostly does not respond to such a model, because For government all students are the same, it may be true that all students can learn the same, but they are not in the same conditions to do it, however with type tests know, pretend to assume it as if all were with the same possibilities And following the theories given by Vygotsky is not the same try to learn on an empty stomach for days in vulnerable areas and conflict, with access to little information and materials as in rural areas or with access to everything in institutions Private and high-class families, it is not a matter of criticizing any of the social conditions, but rather the way the government acts, because if it intends to evaluate all students in the same way, it should guarantee the same conditions. (I apologize if I overflow the subject but I think it is a clear example to understand Vygotsky's theory and the importance it gives to the environment where the child develops).
Vygotsky, unlike Piaget or David Ausubel, focuses his attention on the child's immediate environment, what kind of knowledge the educator can offer him, and how history and culture are very important in understanding the development of learning in the child. Taking this reference as educators we have the responsibility to first understand that all the context where the child develops before thinking about how to transmit knowledge, in contrast and critically the current education in Colombia mostly does not respond to such a model, because For government all students are the same, it may be true that all students can learn the same, but they are not in the same conditions to do it, however with type tests know, pretend to assume it as if all were with the same possibilities And following the theories given by Vygotsky is not the same try to learn on an empty stomach for days in vulnerable areas and conflict, with access to little information and materials as in rural areas or with access to everything in institutions Private and high-class families, it is not a matter of criticizing any of the social conditions, but rather the way the government acts, because if it intends to evaluate all students in the same way, it should guarantee the same conditions. (I apologize if I overflow the subject but I think it is a clear example to understand Vygotsky's theory and the importance it gives to the environment where the child develops).
From my point of view before analyzing Vygotsky's perspective on constructivist learning, we must first analyze and understand that all is constructivism? Then according to this idea, constructivism suggests that learning is not something that is simply transmitted from one person to another, but on the contrary for this to happen knowledge or what is to be learned must be built by the learner himself, Through action and application in different contexts. Therefore taking this approach to the classroom could say that the teacher acts as a mediator between what is going to be learned and who learns, hence the theory of meaningful learning.
ReplyDeleteVygotsky, unlike Piaget or David Ausubel, focuses his attention on the child's immediate environment, what kind of knowledge the educator can offer him, and how history and culture are very important in understanding the development of learning in the child. Taking this reference as educators we have the responsibility to first understand that all the context where the child develops before thinking about how to transmit knowledge, in contrast and critically the current education in Colombia mostly does not respond to such a model, because For government all students are the same, it may be true that all students can learn the same, but they are not in the same conditions to do it, however with type tests know, pretend to assume it as if all were with the same possibilities And following the theories given by Vygotsky is not the same try to learn on an empty stomach for days in vulnerable areas and conflict, with access to little information and materials as in rural areas or with access to everything in institutions Private and high-class families, it is not a matter of criticizing any of the social conditions, but rather the way the government acts, because if it intends to evaluate all students in the same way, it should guarantee the same conditions. (I apologize if I overflow the subject but I think it is a clear example to understand Vygotsky's theory and the importance it gives to the environment where the child develops).
Thanks
ReplyDelete_____________________________________________________________________________________________This is my opinion about the three words: language, learning and teaching.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
The Language
Language is the form that the human being has found and developed to communicate his ideas about the world that surrounds him, his thoughts and sensations of reality. We usually say that language is oral and written, but language is much more than that; Are the gestures we make with our hands, body or face, are the messages that we transmit through art, music and different manifestations of each culture.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
The learning
Learning is the name we have given to the process of acquiring new knowledge and knowledge of our environment. It is one of the actions that we performed most since we were born and open our eyes with desire to know the wonders around us, is the method that has allowed us to discover and marvel at our abilities, to develop them.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
The Teaching
Teaching is the process by which human beings share our experiences and knowledge with the younger generations. It usually happens as an exchange of ideas, doubts and answers that always generate new knowledge. In addition, teaching is the only guarantee that exists to preserve the knowledge that has been discovered and developed over the years.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________